D&AD Executive Council Election: the shockign trooth
D&AD has announced the newest candidates for its Executive Council, and there are some very good people on the list. You can download their manifestos here. (If you're not a member, I'm not sure if you can see the relevant page - sorry.)
Unfortunately, many of the candidates seem not to have checked their entries before presenting them to the world. They're full of things like:
As well as howlers like these...
...and these:

Now, I know for a fact that you don't have to be able to spell to be a good - even a great - designer. I know some brilliant designers, with levels of talent to make you gnash your teeth in envy, who struggle to get through a sentence without tripping over an apostrophe. It doesn't matter a jot to their success as designers. And nor should it.
But I am surprised that anyone puts themselves forward for something as prestigious as this without bothering to proofread their manifesto (or better still, have it checked by someone else).
Things like 'm' for 'my' or 'positivley' are obviously just typos. They'd take a moment to spot and correct. Other errors, like 'effected' for 'affected', are maybe less obvious, but I'd imagine showing the text to a few people in the studio would at least raise the right question marks, and trigger a quick double-check in the dictionary.
Lots of the candidates have sensible things to say about D&AD, and I nodded along with several of them. I just wish more of them cared as much about the written word as they (rightly) do about the visuals.
Heavy sigh.
Labels: D and AD, election, Executive Council, grammar, spelling, writing








